Just some years in the past, searching for case precedent was a hard and time consuming endeavor, demanding persons to search through print copies of case regulation, or to purchase access to commercial online databases. Today, the internet has opened up a host of case regulation search prospects, and several sources offer free access to case regulation.

Delay in recording confessional statement will not be treated fatal for the case of prosecution(Murder Trial)

This Court may well interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer in a very way inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the manner of inquiry or where the conclusion or finding reached through the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. In case the summary or finding is including no reasonable person would have ever reached, the Court might interfere with the summary or perhaps the finding and mildew the relief to make it appropriate to the facts of each and every case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority is definitely the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-enjoy the evidence or the nature of punishment. On the aforesaid proposition, we're fortified by the decision with the Supreme Court while in the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Source: Order: Downloads 252 Order Date: 24-JAN-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp

To report technical problems with our Website, please contact the webmaster. The webmaster will not respond to inquiries seeking legal information or specific cases. Questions regarding specific cases should be directed towards the court in which the case has actually been or will be filed.

Preceding four tax years interpreted. It's not at all from the date of finalisation of audit but from the tax year involved. Read more

کیا ایف آئی آر درخواست گزار کی رپورٹ پر درج کی گئی تھی اور اگر ہاں تو کیا اسے اس کے خلاف ثبوت کے طور پر استعمال کیا جا سکتا ہے؟

The ruling from the first court created case legislation that must be followed by other courts right until or Until either new regulation is created, or even a higher court rules differently.

forty eight . Cr.Misc. 787/2024 (S.B.) Muhammad Anwar V/S S.P Complaint Cell Hyderabad & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad check here 2025 SHC HYD 12 Justice of the Peace u/s 22-A is not really obliged to afford a chance of hearing on the accused party; nor obliged to always or mechanically issue directions for registration of FIR; but is required to consider all relevant factors, with care and caution; to avoid machinery of criminal regulation from being misused; frivolous complaints must be discouraged; relationship, enmity, transactions, litigation and other remedies, are several of the relevant factors. Read more

The prosecution presented substantial evidence, which includes eyewitness testimonies and expert forensic analysis, confirming the copyright nature in the seized currency.

If that judgment goes to appeal, the appellate court will have the chance to review both the precedent plus the case under appeal, Probably overruling the previous case regulation by setting a completely new precedent of higher authority. This might take place several times as being the case works its way through successive appeals. Lord Denning, first with the High Court of Justice, later with the Court of Appeal, provided a famous example of this evolutionary process in his improvement on the concept of estoppel starting from the High Trees case.

Apart from the rules of procedure for precedent, the weight supplied to any reported judgment could depend upon the reputation of both the reporter plus the judges.[seven]

Regardless of its popularity, very few could concentrate on its intricacies. This article is an attempt to highlight the flaws of this section and the very low threshold that governs it.

Furthermore, it addresses the limitation period under Article 91 and 120 of the Limitation Act, focusing on when plaintiff to hunt cancellation. The importance of deciding application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC based solely on plaint averments in highlighted, excluding extrinsic material at this stage. Read more

P.C. for grant of post arrest bail should also be dismissed. Suffice is to look at that that considerations for pre- arrest and post-arrest bail are absolutely different. Reliance in this regard is placed on case law titled as “Shah Nawaz v. The State” 2005 SCMR 1899” wherein it has been held with the august Supreme Court of Pakistan as under:--